Team (mark one): a) Estonian, b) non-Estonian

(Word version)

How well did the umpires do, what should be done better? Give your feedback and mark your opinion below (1 poor, 2 not good, 3 good enough, 4 good, 5 very good).

If you mark 1 or 2, please include also comments! This information will be used for improving the umpire unit:

Umpire operations	1	2	3	4	5
01. Chief Umpire’s performance
02. Professionalism of the umpire unit’s operational leaders
03. Professionalism of the umpire unit in general
04. Impartiality of the umpires in control points and tasks
05. Impartiality of the umpires attached to counter action
06. Impartiality of the umpires on route and outside
07. Information provided beforehand concerning umpire operations
08. Information provided beforehand concerning how umpires will interpret rules
09. Content of the information provided by umpires in briefings and team ldr meetings
10. Visibility of the umpires during the competition
11. How well did umpires do in fulfilling the mission ”observe and report”
12. How well did umpires do in “ensuring the fairness and equal conditions to all”

13. Good in Umpires:

14. Bad in Umpires:

We would also like to ask your opinion concerning the rules of the competition. This information will be passed to ERNA Society for developing the competition itself:

Competition rules	1	2	3	4	5
20. Availability and accessibility of the rules
21. Content of the rules – Rules of Engagement
22. Content of the rules – Rules for CP tasks
23. Content of the rules – Rules for team support, movements, etc
24. Was there enough time for preparing for the competition
25. Was the rules clear enough for preparing for the competition
26. Did rules or availability of rules provide equal conditions to all
27. Were penalties given from recce task, report task, CP tasks and engagements in balance?

30. Was the competition fair?

FEEL FREE TO USE THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PAPER (include row number)